Initial Apple A8X GPU Benchmarks Appear - Beats the '192 Core' Tegra K1

Nvidia has ever had some pretty bad-luck in the Industry where the Tegra was concerned and now information technology seems that there is more to pile up on erstwhile reserves. Apple's newly launched 20nm SoC, the A8X, has a GPU that beats the 192 Kepler Core Tegra K1 if initial benchmarks are to be believed. The Tegra Variant used is the 4+1 variant (32 chip) not the Denver variant, though that shouldn't make that much of a difference. NVIDIA Tegra K1

Apple tree's 20nm SoC A8X beats Nvidia's Tegra K1 in GPU benchmarks

The benchmarks appeared on GFXBench.com and yous can hands compare the A8X (Apple iPad Air 2) with the Nvidia Shield Tablet for an piece of cake next comparison. As you can see below, the A8X's GPU wins the offscreen rounds every fourth dimension, while the Tegra K1 nets more than frames onscreen. This is because of the much higher resolution favored past the Apple product as opposed to only 1080p on the shield tablet. Here are the benchmarks every bit compiled by GSMArena.com:

As you can clearly see, the Tegra K1 is 1.7 frames behind the A8X on the Manhattan offscreen and 7 frames backside on the T-Rex offscreen. Apple tree's A8X is a 20nm SoC while Tegra K1 is a 28nm scrap, and though the divergence is not night and day, the ability consumption levels should be interesting to observe. The Tegra K1 is slightly faster when dealing with onscreen benches. The K1'due south 4+1 variant is slightly weak on th CPU side and has a narrow iii-issue super scalar. Nonetheless, since nosotros are comparing the GPUs, if the benchmarks are coded correctly, the availability of significantly powerful CPU cores shouldn't brand that much of a divergence. Its still 192 Kepler Cores pit confronting the A8X's GPU, which is probably of PowerVR blueprint.

Non much is known about the A8X autonomously from a few hardware specs such every bit its 3 billion worth of transistors, out of order execution and 6-way super scalar design. And most of the specs that we know, just make a difference in the compute sector in which the Nexus 9'southward cores are approximately of equal power to those in the A8X (if you compare core-to-core). Mobile GPUs are becoming ridiculously fast, and if nosotros really desire to see them properly utilized then the offset affair we need is serious game development. Think full desktop rendering and proper games. It is only when that happens that this latent potential of mobile platforms will be properly utilized.